IJMIE

Numerical Investigation of flow through Annular diffusing duct

---

---

Abstract

In the present investigation the distribution of mean velocity, static pressure and total pressure are experimentally studied on an annular curved diffuser of 30° angle of turn with an area ratio of 1.283 and centerline length was chosen as three times of inlet diameter. The experimental results then were numerically validated with the help of Fluent and then a series of parametric investigations are conducted with same centre line length and inlet diameter but with different area ratios varying from 1.15 to 3.75. The measurements were taken at Reynolds number 2.25 x 105 based on inlet diameter and mass average inlet velocity. Predicted results of coefficient of mass averaged static pressure recovery (30%) and coefficient of mass averaged total pressure loss (21%) are in good agreement with the experimental results of coefficient of mass averaged static pressure recovery (26%) and coefficient of mass averaged total pressure loss (17%) respectively. Standard k-ε model in Fluent solver was chosen for validation. From the parametric investigation it is observed that static pressure recovery increases up to an area ratio of 2.86 and between the area ration 2.86 to 3.75, pressure recovery decreases steadily. The coefficient of total pressure loss almost remains constant with the change in area ratio for similar inlet conditions.

Recommended Citation

[1] R.W. Fox, and S.J. Kline, “Flow Regimes in Curves Subsonic
Diffuser,” Trans ASME, Journal of Basic Engineering, Vol. 84,
1962, pp. 303 – 316.
[2] J. Seddon, “Understanding and Countering the Swirl in S- ducts;”
Test on the Sensitivity of swirl to Fences, Aeronautical journal,
1984, pp. 117-127.
[3] A. D. Vakili, J.M. Wu, P. Liver, and M.K. Bhat, Experimental
Investigation of Secondary Flow in a Diffusing S- Duct,
University of Tennessee Space Inst, Report No. TRUTSI 86/14,
University of Tennessee, Tullahoma, TN. 1984.
[4] M .I. Yaras, “Effects of inlets conditions n the flow in a Fishtail
Diffuser with strong Curvature,” Trans ASME, Journal of Fluid
Engineering, Vol. 118, 1996, pp 772 – 778.
[5] B.A. Reichert and B.J. Wendt, “Improving Curved Subsonic
Diffuser Performance with Vortex Generator,” AIAA Journal,
Vol.14, 1996, pp. 65 – 72.
[6] B. Majumdar, S.N. Singh, and D.P. Agrawal, “Flow
Characteristics in S-shaped Diffusing Duct, In Journal of Turbo
and Heat Engines,” Vol. 14, 1997, pp 45 – 57.
[7] T. Sonada, T. Arima, and M.Oana, “The influence of
Downstream Passage on the Flow within an Annular S-shaped
Ducts,” Trans ASME, Journal of Turbo Machinery, Vol. 120,
1998, pp. 714 – 722.
[8] R.G. Dominy, D.A. Kirkham, and A.D. Smith, “Flow
Development through Inter turbine Diffuser”, Trans ASME,
Vol. 120, 1998, pp. 298 – 304.
[9] J.L. Xia, B.l. Smith, T. Zierer, J. Schmidli, and G. Yadigaroglu,
“Study of Turbulent flow Characteristics in a 180° bend
Annular Diffuser with Blow off”, Int. comm. Heat Mass
Transfer, Vol. 26, 1999,pp. 685 – 694.
[10] S. N. Singh, V. Seshadri,, K. Saha, K.K. Vempati and S.
Bharani, “Effect of inlet swirl on the performance of annular
diffusers having the same equivalent cone angle,” Proc.
Inst.Mech. Engineer, Part G, Journal of Aerospace
Engineering Vol. 220, No.2, 2006, pp.129-143.
[11] D. Chowdhoury, Modelling and calibration of pressure probes,
M.E Thesis, Jadavpur University, 2007.
[12] S. Mukhopadhya, A. Dutta, A. N. Mullick and Majumdar, B,
“Effect of Five-hole probe tip shape on its calibration,” Journal
of the Aeronautical Society of India, Vol. 53, No.4, 2001, pp 271
– 279.